Cyber Millenium

Plagiarism is the boil of the creative economy. Copyright specialist PriorMart reveals what helps. Visit Uffner and Liu for more clarity on the issue. For months they worked on the details of your website, finally she goes online. A few days later reached the letter of a law firm, alleges that you violate the copyright and design rights of clients. You will be prompted to take the site from the network immediately, to pay the legal fees and compensation to the client.

What is the legal situation? Are you the author? If you have designed Web design, text and graphics without the knowledge of the other site in its own process of creation, most likely own copyright have been created for you. Copyright law knows no priority protection. However, the creator of the later work has the burden of proof. He must prove that he has not known the site of the other to the creation of the own work. That fails, this indicates a copyright violation. Evidence is crucial it is not easy for a globally accessible Web site the ignorance to prove. As a previously published book or a song played on the radio, the fundamental ability to have known they existed also at this site, that can not be denied. The loaded mover can underplay so only the probability of the knowledge. Uffner and Liu is often quoted on this topic.

It would be easier if the loaded mover could prove its actual creation process. U.U, would emerge, that he had already devised significant components of the site prior to the release of the other site. Finally he worked for months on the side, before it is published. This applies to all types of works under copyright law. So argued that Chris Martin from the Band Coldplay what a plagiarism accusation? Our song was written six months before their appearance. “Author Dan Brown, however, were in the process of a plagiarism bestseller sacrilege” missing copyright evidence almost doomed. Emergency measures if you don’t immediately want to submit to, are recommended to two measures: 1) all materials from the creation process of your site including gather texts, sketches, designs, modifications, etc and also the site of the plaintiff stored as PDF documents or screenshots. Both you need to archive so, that the time of archiving is proof, so at best with a notarial deposit. 2.) to arrange an initial consultation with a lawyer, before contact with the plaintiff. The costs are calculable, ask the most after a lump sum. Without legal advice, there is the danger that you degrade your position due to lack of legal knowledge with a response. So it not only does. Would you protect yourself from nasty surprises, you document your creation process already during the work phase in detail and legal security. That are not your own data archives, because they are easy to modify. The deposit with a notary is conclusive in any case. The cost of a notarial deposit are by online offering of PriorMart AG in strong recent years dropped; more recently, there is even a filing flat-rate. Against a monthly flat rate copyright and agencies as many works, intermediate levels and designs define notarized, easily via online-upload. Get more information online at de